Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
The key to passing the July 2007 Bar Exam has to be a combination of grey goose and multicolored flashcards. I've got money on it.
Figuring Into the Curve
Not Hurting My Chances
- 50 States
- A Girl Walks Into a Bar (Exam)
- A Lawyer Walks Into a Bar (Movie)
- Above the Law
- Boy on a Stick and Slither
- CA Bar Exam Advice 2007
- Failing the Bar
- Law With Grace (By far the funniest bar blooger I've come across.)
- Read This
- Texas Bar None - Where Fun Goes to Die
- The Anonymous Lawyer
- The Tort of Cockblocking (Law & Alcoholism)
- The Unreasonable Man
Watch Madness Unfold
-
▼
2007
(89)
-
▼
July
(20)
- I needed to be rescued
- I'm fucked
- Remember me, every so often, promise me you'll try
- I’m not sure how this all got started, but I can t...
- Do you think you'll pass the bar exam?Of course! ...
- Was it a dream?
- They called you failure's art
- The decision made itself
- Yes, things have gotten bad.
- Blood of christ is dripping in to the eyes of the ...
- And we all freaked out, what a shame
- On My Own from Les Mis - Bar Taker's Edition
- You will burn in hell for all your sins
- I am certain I've become broken, bruised, and numb
- A different kind of pain
- I find it hard to adjust to the lines you're drawi...
- You're a salty sea of misery
- Disfunctional fuck up
- Like a fugitive who just quit running you found ou...
- I'm a loser baby, so why don't you kill me?
-
▼
July
(20)
3 comments:
I think it is the identity of the party, and then the basis for their knowledge. If thats wrong i dunnno.
That was my guess. And what I'm going with on the actual PT if it comes to it.
Try.
I ____, declare as follows:
I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth herein, and, if called as a witness, I could and would testify competently as to all such matters.
This establishes at least a baseline foundation (personal knowledge) and the declarant's willingness to testify as to the same.
And then, the last sentence reads,
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of (if state court, "state," if federal court, "the United States of America" that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on July 24, 2007, at Santa Barbara, California (wherever the declarant is located.
This is the money phrase that allows the court to charge the declarant with perjury if lying. Get state/federal right based on facts. Different laws. I think it has something to do with subjecting yourself to the jurisdiction of the court (if you are out of state, you subject yourself to the laws of the state where you file the decl. I am not sure why you put the city, but in California you do.
good luck on the bar. Remember, you don't have to Ace it, you just have to pass it. And if you don't know the law, don't be shy about making it up. The person that grades your essays/mpt's is a lawyer who is getting paid peanuts to do so. And while we would like to think that it is a s.ct. clerk who is grading, it is probably on the other side of the sliding scale. So when you bullshit, be confident (although, you can always add some countervailing considerations).
Post a Comment